Transporter-16 Rideshare: VSFB SLC-4E : 2026-03-30 11:02 UTC

Here are some of the identifications/current fits more to come later or tomorrow, special thanks to @PE0SAT and @pe2bz for their help to perform and verify identifications:

Temporary NORAD ID Satellite NORAD ID to follow Other NORAD IDs Identified Deployed Received Last Update
- PeakSat 68616 - YES YES Received Identified, here are the ikhnos results
- COSMO 68460 - YES YES Received Identified, here are the ikhnos results
- T.MicroSat-2 68433 - YES YES Received Identified, here are the ikhnos results
- ERMIS-1 68468 - YES YES Received Identified, here are the ikhnos results
- ERMIS-2 68420 - YES YES Received Identified, here are the ikhnos results
98367 ERMIS-3 68425 68430,68434 NO YES Received -
- TORO-3 68481 - YES YES Received Identified, here are the ikhnos results
98370 OPTISAT 68418 68419 NO YES Received -
- LUNA-2 68470 - YES YES Received Identified, here are the ikhnos results
- PARUS-6U1 68456 - YES YES Received Identified, here are the ikhnos results
- SAL-E 68458 - YES YES Received Identified, here are the ikhnos results
- JACK-002 68417 - YES YES Received Identified, here are the ikhnos results
- HADES-SA 68446 - YES YES Received Identified, here are the ikhnos results
- ION SCV Astounding Alexandra 68435 - YES YES Received Identified, here are the ikhnos results
- ARQSAT-1 (FEMTO-1) 68419 - YES YES Received Identified, here are the ikhnos results
- Out of the Box 68428 - YES YES Received Identified, here are the ikhnos results
9 Likes

Hi @fredy

We’ve checked the TLE for 68474 (Object BL) with BLACK KITE 2(we believe it’s 88092). The parameters are match. We can confirm that 68474 is BLACK KITE 2.

88092

1 88092U 26103.91718706 +.00001756 +00000+0 +17747-3 0 0036
2 88092 97.7497 63.1931 0003939 93.2647 266.9022 14.9228479700214

TRANSPORTER-16 OBJECT BL
1 68474U 26067BL 26103.91718706 .00001756 00000+0 17747-3 0 9998
2 68474 97.7497 63.1931 0003938 93.2647 266.9022 14.92284797 2148

1 Like

Hi Bali, thanks a lot for your interest and for sharing the reception results.

Unfortunately, we’re not able to share the decoding/conversion script, as it involves a proprietary format used by the module vendor. Sorry about that.

We really appreciate your continued interest in our satellites and the reception reports you’ve been sharing. We’ve noticed your observations and truly appreciate your support.

Thank you for your understanding.

Unfortunately due to an urgent issue, I’ll not be able to check today the rest of the satellites, if you have any suggestions, please post them here and I’ll make sure to add them in DB.

1 Like

Object 68431 437.074 DISCO-2

Jan | PE0SAT

4 Likes

Good evening @BV2DQ,

PARUS-6U1 is active and we have good signals received. Can you share information on the data that is being send.
I have been trying to decode the data but unable to get some frames.

Jan | PE0SAT

1 Like

Endurosat frames.

Gaspacs soundmodem

Thanks Vlad,

I had a look at Endurosat but the frames look random, so not sure about that.

***** VERBOSE PDU DEBUG PRINT ******
((transmitter . 9k6 FSK Endurosat downlink))
pdu length =         90 bytes
pdu vector contents = 
0000: 59 84 9c 60 a8 92 a8 7e 7e 7e 71 09 74 52 cf 51 
0010: b7 d6 05 03 06 84 25 53 24 9a ea 9d 74 4a fd bf 
0020: af 83 65 5f 1c 84 79 90 f4 69 76 b5 70 72 a0 e3 
0030: 7a 6b 95 93 66 4e c1 8a 08 90 19 b8 d9 e8 7b 62 
0040: 80 c2 d2 a9 38 d9 e0 bf 24 43 28 eb e0 ac ab 3d 
0050: 12 48 16 26 9d 72 5e be 80 e7 
************************************
***** VERBOSE PDU DEBUG PRINT ******
((transmitter . 9k6 FSK Endurosat downlink))
pdu length =        127 bytes
pdu vector contents = 
0000: 7e 84 9c 60 a8 92 a8 7e 7e 7e be ea d6 bb 12 5c 
0010: be 5d a7 ce a4 d1 53 83 48 9c eb 42 36 af 21 0b 
0020: 9a bd d0 2c 73 ab 6c bb 36 64 10 d0 24 81 5c 09 
0030: 2b 4d 83 9f f6 56 82 88 8c d9 81 ae eb a7 ab f5 
0040: 0d b4 59 f3 86 29 97 21 37 91 7f db 48 7b 27 81 
0050: 5c 2a e3 66 a8 bd e2 9f 85 8d 3f 05 12 c2 3f a7 
0060: 32 04 cd c7 a4 03 e8 19 8f c2 da 07 08 d1 25 2c 
0070: 29 8a b9 c0 14 00 7a ba 75 40 c1 df 47 ae 02 
************************************
***** VERBOSE PDU DEBUG PRINT ******
((transmitter . 9k6 FSK Endurosat downlink))
pdu length =        101 bytes
pdu vector contents = 
0000: 64 84 9c 60 a8 92 a8 7e 7e 7e f4 7f 16 98 ae d9 
0010: 87 ce e7 e1 d1 dd 7e 54 ba 0d af eb e4 99 57 1f 
0020: 5a 9f 41 54 c7 dd 52 c3 90 8a 88 9d c9 a2 bf bf 
0030: 84 34 41 7b 36 91 7f df 08 33 21 7b c8 71 8c d4 
0040: 6c 64 9f 7e ef 0a 70 c5 8e 66 75 67 a7 b8 c4 3a 
0050: 25 a6 17 d4 f6 f6 1b 16 f5 8f 57 26 cf ca 3f d4 
0060: 33 e5 b1 1f 9d 
************************************

I used the following gr-satellites yaml file:

name: PARUS-6U1
norad: 68456
data:
  &endurosat Endurosat Telemetry:
     unknown
transmitters:
  9k6 FSK Endurosat downlink:
    frequency: 437.195e+6
    modulation: FSK
    baudrate: 9600
    deviation: 2600
    framing: Endurosat
    data:
    - *endurosat

Jan | PE0SAT

4 Likes

Hi @fredy,
We have found an updated TLE for VEGAFLY-1 from satellitemap.space.
Could you please help verify and update it in the SatNOGS database?
Link: Find Vegafly-1 — Live Satellite Tracking

TLE:

1 68420U 26067E   26107.82054536  .00007174  00000-0  34959-3 0  9992 
2 68420  97.4448  67.1953 0003630  91.8754 268.2896 15.18633539  2787

Thank you very much for your support!

1 Like

Hi @vegastargs,

I’ve just changed Vegafly-1 entry in DB to follow that object (68420), however have in mind that this is a random assignment and not identification.

The developers of satellitemap.space told me that they use Jonathan C. McDowell’s catalog as a source. You can find this catalog in https://planet4589.org/space/gcat/data/cat/satcat.html and its documentation in Jonathan's Space Report | GCAT.

As you will see in Jonathan’s catalog the Vegafly-1 entry, next to 68420, in the Satcat column has the value NNA which from the documentation of the catalog means that the satellite isn’t identified but just random assignment/placeholder.

I guess that this is done by Jonathan to check if all the objects of this launch have an object in space-track.org/NORAD catalog or if we miss something or have more than expected objects.

As we have kind of mitigated yesterday’s issue, I’ll try today and tomorrow to continue the analysis to identify the rest satellites of this launch that the Network or strf observations from our contributors have received. In case that weren’t received I’m going to assign a random object to follow based on some other criteria.

1 Like

same impression. does not appear to be Endurosat framing despite reasonable snr. picure is of 1 sec burst. bob n6rfm

3 Likes

Hi Everyone,

Of course our good friend Vlad was on the mark, but the plot thickens! A deeper dive using Claude.AI, confirmed Endurosat framing but with a twist.

For the IQ sample I collected, there is “5× 0xAA preamble, then 0x7E 0x7E sync word, then 84 9C 60 A8 92 A8 — which is BN0TIT in AX.25 left-shifted encoding! And bit offset 49 shows it even more clearly: 424e30544954 = BN0TIT in plain ASCII!”

The zip file attached which includes a test decoder in python, a test iq file called p1.iq and an output.txt file. Results below are from the frames shown above using Inspectrum. Sample- 50000SPS_437194000Hz_2026_04_18_T08-24-00Z over Bristol_RI, FN41iq. Note that the python script will need to be edited if you want to try this.

Example partially decoded frame. Source still scrambled but BN0TIT-15 destination. tada!

[PARUS-6U1 Frame #3]
Dest: BN0TIT-15
Src: ??�1%1-10 (G3RUH scrambled)
Len: 112 bytes
Hex: 849c60a892a87e7e7e34624a62b4820ffdcfc8df211c4c3580d7b53e4c83acc18b7f0f1fe4bd16f04e4ecb19ab3997b7d7af693f2e272eeb2908b10bd365fb43ad924fdc5b05e00a6ef58865495db0401c730971468d5892946df0dd3f4605ba3d902fdd1275a0cebc60612861d1967f
message_debug :info: The print_pdu port is deprecated and will be removed; forwarding to print.
***** VERBOSE PDU DEBUG PRINT ******
((crc_ok . #t) (src . ??�1%1-10 (scrambled)) (dest . BN0TIT-15))
pdu length = 112 bytes
pdu vector contents =
0000: 84 9c 60 a8 92 a8 7e 7e 7e 34 62 4a 62 b4 82 0f
0010: fd cf c8 df 21 1c 4c 35 80 d7 b5 3e 4c 83 ac c1
0020: 8b 7f 0f 1f e4 bd 16 f0 4e 4e cb 19 ab 39 97 b7
0030: d7 af 69 3f 2e 27 2e eb 29 08 b1 0b d3 65 fb 43
0040: ad 92 4f dc 5b 05 e0 0a 6e f5 88 65 49 5d b0 40
0050: 1c 73 09 71 46 8d 58 92 94 6d f0 dd 3f 46 05 ba
0060: 3d 90 2f dd 12 75 a0 ce bc 60 61 28 61 d1 96 7f


pharus6u1_decoder_testing.zip (1.0 MB)

Good hunting all,

Bob

N6RFM

6 Likes

Identified 68203 Object F on 401.250 MHz

3 Likes

@vegastargs I forgot to check the status table in Transporter-16 Rideshare: VSFB SLC-4E : 2026-03-30 11:02 UTC - #144 by fredy as you can see there, with evidence, 68420 is identified as ERMIS-2 satellite, so it can not be VEGAFLY-1.

Hopefully later today I’ll be able to complete any further analysis a re-assign another object to follow for VEGAFLY-1.

2 Likes

68248 Object N 402.357 MHz

my guess microsat modulation.

1 Like

68460 Object AW on 401.200 MHz

1 Like

68416 Object A, where it all started with :slight_smile: 400.500 MHz

1 Like

Hi @PE0SAT and @N6RFM

I am a member of the PARUS-6U1 team. Thank you so much for tracking our satellite and sharing the received data! It is incredibly exciting for us to see that the amateur radio community is receiving our signals with such good strength.

I noticed you mentioned that the frames look random after the initial callsign. You are absolutely right! The reason for this is that we are using the EnduroSat UHF “Pipe Mode”, but we implemented a custom software protocol inside the payload, which includes G3RUH scrambling, a custom CRC, and additional Reed-Solomon Forward Error Correction (FEC).

Based on the hex dumps you provided, here is the exact breakdown of our packet structure. (Note: The first byte in your dump is the EnduroSat Payload Length L):

  • Byte 0: Payload Length L
  • Bytes 1 to 9 (Unscrambled Header): 84 9c 60 a8 92 a8 7e 7e 7e. This is our callsign BN0TIT (AX.25 format, shifted left by 1 bit) followed by three 0x7E flags. We kept this part unscrambled so the frames are easily identifiable.
  • Bytes 10 to (L - 18) (Telemetry Payload): This section contains a 9-byte internal header (which includes a Function ID) followed by the actual sensor data structure. This entire section is G3RUH scrambled.
  • Bytes (L - 17) to (L - 16) (Software CRC): A 16-bit software CRC calculated over the unscrambled telemetry payload. This is also G3RUH scrambled.
  • Last 16 Bytes, Bytes (L - 15) to L (RS Parity): Reed-Solomon Parity (16 bytes) calculated over the scrambled payload. This is appended at the very end of the packet for forward error correction.

To read the actual data, you need to strip the 16-byte RS parity at the end, descramble the payload and the CRC using a standard G3RUH descrambler, and then parse the internal structure.

Currently, we are only planning to release the data structure for our Power/Battery telemetry. When the Function ID inside the descrambled payload equals 0, the data following the internal header is our EPS (Electrical Power System) telemetry, containing our battery voltages, currents, and power generation status.

We are finalizing a standalone decoder/parser for the EPS telemetry. We will publish this parser on our GitHub repository in a few days so that the amateur radio community can easily decode and monitor our satellite’s power status. I will share the GitHub link in this thread as soon as it is ready!

Thank you again for your amazing support and for keeping an eye on PARUS-6U1!

Best regards, The PARUS-6U1 Team

8 Likes

Hi Eric and the PARUS-6U1 Team

Thanks so much for the additional details! Looking forward to having a standalone decoder/parser for the EPS telemetry.

Very Best,

Bob

N6RFM

2 Likes

68496 Obj CJ 2270
68504 Obj CS 2270
68500 Obj CN 2276
68494 Obj CG 2263.5

Confirmation follows. Looks like 4 Iceyes

2 Likes