Hey @bali @fredy Can you see the 98313 TLE its not updated, can you update the TLE for better Observations
1 Like
Hi, unfortunately I’m currently traveling and running for some other tasks, I’ll try to find some time to update the TLE. If you have any TLE set to suggest let me know and I’ll get it in DB as soon as possible.
1 Like
1 Like
thanks for the image, but i observed that #14007500 #14006902 with 69 and 37 elevation still no reception.
1 Like
I think we should update the TLE recent observations are also missing the reception
1 Like
The image shared uses the following TLE and is a good match and will provide reception when the Satellite is active.
DRISHITI
1 98313U 26124.91288568 +.00002874 +00000+0 +13562-3 0 00054
2 98313 97.4081 23.5108 0005637 161.2782 198.8661 15.20239034000235
If you look at this observation you can see the TLE is a match.
If you have a better TLE set, then please share.
Jan | PE0SAT
3 Likes
Small thought: maybe it’s worth separating the no-RX cases from the TLE question first.
If the current TLE still lines up with at least one recent pass, then high-elevation obs with no reception could also point to TX activity, RF/frequency assumptions, station-side issues, or demod/decoder assumptions.
Maybe comparing a few recent obs side by side would help: obs id, max elevation, station, TLE epoch used, waterfall evidence, IQ availability, and any successful RX close in time.
That should make it easier to tell whether this is really a TLE update issue, or another failure mode showing up as “no reception”.
F.
1 Like
hello friend.
seen the tle still in good shape as @PE0SAT say.
from this obs at low elevation 25.0°:
from this obs at high elevation 75.0°:
you got the signal friend (time 200). look at this
i recommend this tutorial to enhanced your groundstation waterfall
good luck!
73!
1 Like
Hey Man,
Thanks for sharing this, its very useful to understand the graphs now