Observation 300186: PCSAT (26931)

[motionlab]

Hi,

I am very sorry to cause troubles. This was me trying to support, please see by comment at

Motionlab Berlin vetting as failed instead of bad

We have reached out again via email to the user. We need to find a way to “protect” ourselves as we grow from accidental or neglected vetting. There are open technical issues on the satnogs-network repository (like the ability to re-vet as a ground station owner), and ongoing discussions on how to do that in scale (crowd-sourcing vetting, ML automation and other). On the specific “issue” with @motionlab, I will be deactivating temporarily their account once the notice we sent over email expire…

Greetings
Ansgar