We have reached out again via email to the user.
We need to find a way to “protect” ourselves as we grow from accidental or neglected vetting. There are open technical issues on the satnogs-network repository (like the ability to re-vet as a ground station owner), and ongoing discussions on how to do that in scale (crowd-sourcing vetting, ML automation and other).
On the specific “issue” with @motionlab, I will be deactivating temporarily their account once the notice we sent over email expires, until they respond and confirm that they read the vetting guidelines.
On a more specific note, @bob please, once again be considerate to the rest of the community. Cheers!