Observation 291497: M-CUBED

[Zathras]

Regarding Observation 291497 …
@motionlab
Vetted as bad but similar to https://network.satnogs.org/observations/291498/ vetted good. Why?

[pierros]

Similar situation with the other thread. @motionlab please be more cautious on vetting.

[motionlab]

Hi,

I am sorry. Yes I will be very cautious. sorry. Please see

Motionlab Berlin vetting as failed instead of bad

We have reached out again via email to the user. We need to find a way to “protect” ourselves as we grow from accidental or neglected vetting. There are open technical issues on the satnogs-network repository (like the ability to re-vet as a ground station owner), and ongoing discussions on how to do that in scale (crowd-sourcing vetting, ML automation and other). On the specific “issue” with @motionlab, I will be deactivating temporarily their account once the notice we sent over email expire…

Greetings
Ansgar