Observation 129626: XIWANG-1 (36122)

Satellites & Observations Observations
1

Regarding Observation 129626 …

I’ve vetted this as bad, because in the original spectrogram I can’t see any signal.
Today I’ve opened the audio file to have a deeper look onto the spectrum.
And there I found a signal:
Nearly all bad vetted observations of XIWANG-1 of the last weeks I have checked are good in fact.
Is it possible to shrink the dynamic range of the spectrograms?
The noise level of station 47 is never under -85dB and
maybe this won 15dB make the weak cw signal it a little bit more visible?

129626.png128×764 29.7 KB

2

Station owners can (and should) adjust the waterfall range locally, see the last section of How to do some client adjustments.

1 Like
3

Thank you for the link, this was exactly what I was looking for.