2024-08-29 09:20 UTC and 11:00 UTC: ISS Cubesat Deployment (JAXA) J-SSOD#31 - [CosmoGirl-Sat, SaganSat0, SAKURA, Wisseed Sat, Binar-2, -3, -4]

Updated TLE sets for the first batch of the deployment:

CosmoGirl-Sat
1 98811U          24243.20000000  .00000000  00000-0  42798-3 0    00
2 98811  51.6396 310.9081 0011140 160.0482  89.0133 15.50912679    08
Sakura
1 99196U          24243.20000000  .00000000  00000-0 -13037-2 0    01
2 99196  51.6396 308.8949 0010630 163.2516  87.0596 15.49855813    05
SaganSat0
1 98810U          24243.20000000  .00000000  00000-0 -13037-2 0    03
2 98810  51.6396 308.8949 0010630 163.2516  87.0596 15.49855813    07

Notes:

  1. CosmoGirl-Sat one isn’t very accurate but should be better than the initial from ISS
  2. SaganSat0 one is the same and based on Sakura generated TLE, given that we haven’t received any signal until now from the satellite.
2 Likes

Received also CosmoGirl-Sat (Emma, エマ) (both HK types).

2024-08-30 04:07:40 UTC
COSMO0 JS1YOI 000000 A489C61660 (type 1)

2024-08-30 04:10:58 UTC
COSMO0 JS1YOI 000000 000000A800 (type 2)

Contrary to their CW beacon Format, they apparently decided to put the satellites’s callsign (JS1YOI) in the position of the groundstation’s callsign and leave the position for the latter zeroed (000000) instead.

Please report your receptions to contact2@cosmosgirlham.org.

2 Likes

No reception of SaganSat 0 so far from my side.

1 Like

TLE sets for the second batch of the deployment:

Binar-2
1 98808U          24243.20000000  .00000000  00000-0  42798-3 0    06
2 98808  51.6396 309.8878 0011511 153.3866  94.7392 15.42795377    03
Binar-3
1 98807U          24243.20000000  .00000000  00000-0  42798-3 0    05
2 98807  51.6396 308.8348 0011140 160.5598  88.7666 15.49280554    03
Binar-4
1 98806U          24243.20000000  .00000000  00000-0  42798-3 0    04
2 98806  51.6396 309.0372 0011140 158.8721  89.6828 15.48281306    05

Notes:

  1. For all of them we will need more observations to have more accurate sets, however they are much better than the initial ones.
3 Likes

Do note that preamble and sync word is always cut from a demodulated frame. It should check the length and crc before passing it on as a successful frame. Preamble is not supposed to be complete, just to synchronize the frequency and time, sync can be allowed to have garbled bits, the rest should have a crc to validate it.

2 Likes

received audio beacon from BINAR-2, pass over Bali, 12:54 UTC.
it say VK6FG Jo… please correct me if im wrong.

i put the video in this link.

2 Likes

An updated TLE set for CosmoGirl-Sat by @PE0SAT:

CosmoGirl-Sat
1 98811U          24243.23888889  .00000000  00000-0  42204-3 0    04
2 98811  51.6391 308.9142 0011367 300.4446 166.5994 15.49917522    05
1 Like

Hi Tristan i just got audio when BINAR-2 pass over my QTH, around 12:54 UTC. The audio say " VK6FG jo "
im RX around 437.700 Mhz, it outside from ISS Downlink freq.
i need your explain, is it BINAR-2 have a audio beacon?
Thank you

Sounds more like ducting over the ocean from Australia based on the call, somewhere around a 2800 km path if so?

Hi, Binar doesn’t have an audio beacon, I think this was ducting from mine site communications in WA’s north.

Still very interesting! I will share this with the WA HAM community and see if we can find out who it was.

Here are some updated TLE sets, some of them are more accurate than the others, hopefully in the next iterations with more observations coming we will get better results:

CosmoGirl-Sat
1 98811U          24244.20000000  .00000000  00000-0  42204-3 0    03
2 98811  51.6391 303.0599 0011355 302.5779 132.3822 15.50546689    01
SaganSat0
1 98810U          24244.20000000  .00000000  00000-0 -13037-2 0    04
2 98810  51.6396 303.8569 0010110 166.8277 267.4687 15.49990808    05
Sakura
1 99196U          24244.20000000  .00000000  00000-0 -13037-2 0    02
2 99196  51.6396 303.8569 0010110 166.8277 267.4687 15.49990808    03
Binar-2
1 98808U          24244.20000000  .00000000  00000-0  42798-3 0    07
2 98808  51.6396 300.9051 0011501 157.1300 287.3082 15.53469813    03
Binar-3
1 98807U          24244.20000000  .00000000  00000-0  42798-3 0    06
2 98807  51.6396 303.6845 0011121 164.2536 268.9410 15.49924163    00
Binar-4
1 98806U          24244.20000000  .00000000  00000-0  42798-3 0    05
2 98806  51.6396 309.7547 0011115 162.5344 266.6013 15.49364799    03
3 Likes

This was CosmoGirl-Sat this morning SatNOGS Network - Observation 10148045 not sure if this is what we are expecting to see.

Poor signal

It is also that it is almost 2kHz off, I’m going to add in SatNOGS DB transmitter entry this frequency shift.

2 Likes

Yes I can see that on the waterfall its off center by about 2kHz as you say.

I wouldn’t expect too much from the SatNOGS’s integrated automatic CW decoder.

If not I/Q, then record the audio as USB or LSB with about 10 kHz filter (to give the currently not so correct TLEed signal the chance to be in it) and afterwards analyse the file in an audio editor/viewer in spectrogram view (not waveform view). I’m using ocenaudio.

In case of a not so bad signal, it could look like this.

2 Likes

I downloaded the audio from the observation and opened it in Oceanaudio and looked at it under the spectrogram I received two transmission in HK type 2.

3 Likes

5 Likes

BINAR-2 RAW Telemetry
2024-08-30 00:58:11 UTC
Replay audio file

1 Frame with the wrong timestamp uploaded to SatNOGS DB:
https://db.satnogs.org/satellite/FACZ-7987-8249-5385-5279#data

Huge thanks UZ7HO for new SoundModem!!!
http://uz7.ho.ua/binar2.zip

5 Likes

Great job!! Sure is nice when people include some ASCII in their payloads.

5 Likes

I’ve fixed that, thanks for pointing out.

1 Like