Spaceward - HANBIT-NANO - 2025-12-23 01:00 UTC

Time check, please? 2200utc has passed.

oops my bad… this was the BRT time, the right utc time is 2025-12-23 01:00 UTC

2 Likes

TLE for 2025-12-23 01:00 UTC

SOLARAS S2
1 98461U          25357.04513889  .00000000  00000-0  50000-4 0    00
2 98461  40.0000  66.4597 0001497   0.0000 356.4413 15.90816786    09
FLORIPASAT-2A
1 98456U          25357.04513889  .00000000  00000-0  50000-4 0    04
2 98456  40.0000  66.4597 0001497   0.0000 356.4413 15.90816786    03
FLORIPASAT-2B
1 98455U          25357.04513889  .00000000  00000-0  50000-4 0    03
2 98455  40.0000  66.4597 0001497   0.0000 356.4413 15.90816786    02
JUSSARA-K
1 98454U          25357.04513889  .00000000  00000-0  50000-4 0    02
2 98454  40.0000  66.4597 0001497   0.0000 356.4413 15.90816786    01
PION-BR2
1 98453U          25357.04513889  .00000000  00000-0  50000-4 0    01
2 98453  40.0000  66.4597 0001497   0.0000 356.4413 15.90816786    00
2 Likes

In total 656 observations have been scheduled for the first 24h after deployment of the satellites. We have used the TLE sets of the previous post.

The difference in the number of scheduled observations is based to:

  • Frequency of transmission of the satellite
  • Orbit of the satellite/TLE set
  • Request by or communication with the satellite team
  • Spectrum misuse or violation of regulations
Temp NORAD ID Satellite Scheduled Observations
98461 SOLARAS S2 386
98454 Jussara-K 91
98455 FloripaSat-2B 90
98456 FloripaSat-2A 89
Total 656

Unfortunately for “Pion-BR2” there isn’t any hint of its frequency, so is not scheduled for now.

To station owners, have in mind that the TLE are not accurate and may change, so for better results don’t scheduled too far in future :wink:

2 Likes

Not sure if the stream is delayed, but from the countdown clock on the stream it seems that the launch time is 01:13 UTC… However I’ll stay to the announcement just to be sure.

@pu4elt if just in case have any info about the update time please let us know, thanks!

1 Like

Yep, I’ll keep you informed… It seems that if it doesn’t work out this time, we’ll only have a new window in April of next year (Unofficial information).

Also, pay attention to FloripaSat-2B

It seems that the launch date is changed so here are the new TLE sets for 2025-12-23 01:13 UTC:

SOLARAS S2
1 98461U 14900A   25357.05416667  .00000000  00000-0  50000-4 0    01
2 98461  40.0000  69.7186 0001497   0.0000 356.4413 15.90816786    09
FLORIPASAT-2A
1 98456U 14900A   25357.05416667  .00000000  00000-0  50000-4 0    05
2 98456  40.0000  69.7186 0001497   0.0000 356.4413 15.90816786    03
FLORIPASAT-2B
1 98455U 14900A   25357.05416667  .00000000  00000-0  50000-4 0    04
2 98455  40.0000  69.7186 0001497   0.0000 356.4413 15.90816786    02
JUSSARA-K
1 98454U 14900A   25357.05416667  .00000000  00000-0  50000-4 0    03
2 98454  40.0000  69.7186 0001497   0.0000 356.4413 15.90816786    01
PION-BR2
1 98453U 14900A   25357.05416667  .00000000  00000-0  50000-4 0    02
2 98453  40.0000  69.7186 0001497   0.0000 356.4413 15.90816786    00

I’m going to reschedule the observations…

1 Like

In total 604 observations have been scheduled for the first 24h after deployment of the satellites. We have used the TLE sets of the previous post.

The difference in the number of scheduled observations is based to:

Frequency of transmission of the satellite
Orbit of the satellite/TLE set
Request by or communication with the satellite team
Spectrum misuse or violation of regulations
Temp NORAD ID Satellite Scheduled Observations
98461 SOLARAS S2 304
98456 FloripaSat-2A 100
98454 Jussara-K 100
98455 FloripaSat-2B 100
Total 604
1 Like

From the stream:

It seems that the rocket didn’t make it :frowning:

5 Likes

Okay, apparently there were problems with the flight… Two loud explosions were heard (The first one approximately 50 seconds after launch) :cry:

Thanks for your efforts @fredy in calculating the TLE’s for us and adding the satellites to the SatNOGS network :grin:

3 Likes

Sure hate to see that - so much work by those involved in the various sats.

Yes - thanks so much for helping us all get ready.

5 Likes

Space is hard, especially for the first launches, I remember the firefly first one that failed which had LSF’s PICOBUS and QUBIK 1 and 2 mission.

I guess people in innospace will have a lot of data to process. Hopefully for the satellite teams, they may have the opportunity to fly on the next launch.

3 Likes

So sad for everyone involved. Thanks also helping us get ready.

2 Likes

Just out of curiosity

It appears that the rocket suffered a premature disassembly in flight (the structure could not withstand the aerodynamic force)… Again, unofficial information.

1 Like

https://x.com/MundoEConflicto/status/2003278414191677739 here there is a better view of the explosion.

@pu4elt keep in mind that the disassembly/explosion is sometimes a safety measure triggered if something isn’t nominal, so it may not be the cause of the fail.

Of course all these are speculations, I guess in the next days and after data analysis, there will be a more detailed announcement from innospace.

2 Likes

Yes, just speculation that’s popping up, hehehehe… Now there are reports that there was a trajectory error and then an explosion… Anyway, what a shame.

My eyes are now fixed on the launch on the 28th :grin::grin:

2 Likes