On the next RocketLab Electron launch, Melbourne Space Program’s ACRUX-1 will be launched. It is a 1U CubeSat built by students at the University of Melbourne, Australia, where I got my undergraduate electrical engineering degree
It is the second satellite built by Melbourne Uni students. You may have heard of the first: Australis OSCAR 5 (AO-5) which was also the first satellite launched by the newly formed AMSAT!
It has been coordinated with the IARU at 437.200 MHz 9k6 GMSK
Hi!
I generated a pre-launch TLE based on the published target orbit (450 km x 450 km from the PressKit) with the inclination of BlackSky Global-1 (97.48°, source: skyrocket.de - BlackSky Global) for a launch at the beginning of the window (2019-06-27T04:30:00Z) using sattools by @cgbsat.
Data is decoded from a nice observation from @vk5qi!
I have just added a decoder for ACRUX-1 to satnogs-decoders - a dashboard will follow as soon as there is a fixed NORAD ID available and people start transmitting data (either via SiDS or via SatNOGS network) for it!
There was a request on IRC #cubesat channel for trying to receive the satellite PAINANI-1. The person that requested that said that this satellite was in this launch.
It’s not coordinated by IARU but it has a request for coordination. I’ve added it into the DB and I’m going to schedule a couple of observations to test if it is a valid case, as there isn’t any other reference on this satellite or that it was in this rocket.
I can confirm that the packets received in observation #783079 (https://network.satnogs.org/observations/783079/) were decoded using the FSK flowgraph, not the MSK one. I had intentionally changed my settings.py file to force the use of the FSK flowgraph to see if it would work - and it does.
So it might be worth changing the modulation type to FSK9k6.
ACRUX-1 changed to follow 44369 in network, also we have changed temporarily the decoder to GFSK, in order to be able to decode, as GMSK decoder doesn’t work very well.
However two other stations at the same period didn’t get anything. The difference between station #232 and the other two is that #232 has directional yagi antenna instead of omni ones on the other two.