Here are the latest TLE sets from @cgbsat and @pierros. (bellow TLE set for GuaraniSat-1(99774 in DB) has 99773 as we didn’t know which of the BIRDS4 was) :
MAYA-2 has been received, see bellow for more info
GUARANISAT-1 has been received
RSP-01 has been received but is very faint
WARP-01 hasn’t been received
STARS-EC both cubesats A and B have been received but only on the CW frequencies, signal of B is very faint
About Maya-2, it seems to have issue with its transmission, in most observations of the BIRDS4 is not visible but in the four observations bellow we have a signal of it:
K is -.- and Y is -.-- also the other letters X(-…-) and Z(–…) doesn’t start with -.- which means that is 99% Maya-2 and for some reason (low battery?) has cut the last dash.
JG6YMK special callsign exists but it doesn’t seem to be related with satellites as I can understand from here.
A quick update from latest analysis on the orbits: it shows that yesterday’s TLE sets are still good to use and describe pretty well the orbits of the satellites.
Nice, but unfortunately they accept ONLY reports generated with their software
“Receiving by ears” it’s not an option… ( slightly adapted from famous sentence by Gene Krantz )
We have 8 “0 TBA - TO BE ASSIGNED” TLE sets from spacetrack for this deployment. We are going to wait assignment before identify them in DB, until then these are the current fits (with bold what we follow in DB and Network):
TAUSAT-1: OBJECT SC(47926)
It’s very clear as there isn’t any other object near it
OPUSAT-II: haven’t been received we follow OBJECT SA(47924)
An almost random choice
TSURU: one of OBJECT SB(47925), OBJECT SD(47927)
99.99% that is OBJECT SD as in some of the observations doesn’t fit OBJECT SB well, but let’s have some more observations
MAYA-2: one of OBJECT SF(47929), OBJECT SG(47930), OBJECT SH(47931)
Too close to say for sure, given also that the last good observation was ~24h ago.
GUARANISAT-1: one of OBJECT SF(47929), OBJECT SG(47930), OBJECT SH(47931)
Too close to say for sure, given also that the last good observation was more than 48h ago.
RSP-01: one of OBJECT SB(47925), OBJECT SD(47927), OBJECT SE(47928)
Given that OBJECT SD and SE are fitting better to other satellites, 90% it is OBJECT SB, however we need more observations to say for sure.
WARP-01: haven’t been received we follow OBJECT SH(47931)
An almost random choice
STARS-EC: OBJECT SE(47928)
It’s very clear as in some observations there isn’t any other object near it
After receiving OPUSAT-II, it seems to fit one of we have changed the TLE set to follow OBJECT SF(47929), OBJECT SG(47930), OBJECT SH(47931) but it still to close to say.
I’ve changed it to follow OBJECT SH(47931) for now in DB. Still TLE sets are TBA(TO BE ASSIGNED) so we need to wait for any identification.
EDIT: Note that the TLE are 2 days old so it may fit other objects too…
MAYA-2: one of OBJECT SF(47929), OBJECT SG(47930), OBJECT SH(47931)
From previous data as we haven’t received it for a couple of days
GUARANISAT-1: one of OBJECT SF(47929), OBJECT SG(47930), OBJECT SH(47931)
From previous data as we haven’t received it for a couple of days
RSP-01: identified as OBJECT SB(47925)
Here are the results of ikhnos on observation 3816752. SD and SE Objects looks to be close but are 100% identified as other satellites and have a slight difference on this and other observations.
WARP-01: haven’t been received but given the current and previous fits it should be OBJECT SA(47924), need more observations and identify all the other objects of this launch to be 100% sure.
I’ve changed the TLE we follow for OPUSAT-II as in the latest observation there was a slight curve, so for now it is going to follow OBJECT SF(47929). As Guaranisat-1 was following OBJECT SF(47929) I decided to change it to OBJECT SH(47931) that OPUSAT-II was following.
Still the objects are too close for any identification.
