Regarding Observation 538828 …
Why is this observation considered bad? There are spikes (though small) visible on the waterfall @ 200s-270s and the beacon is audible on the audio graph?
Regarding Observation 538828 …
Why is this observation considered bad? There are spikes (though small) visible on the waterfall @ 200s-270s and the beacon is audible on the audio graph?
There is no CW beacon their is how ever some noise from either another sat or local interference.
The sats signal will always appear as nearly a perfect straight line on the waterfall.