Observation 302466: E-ST@R-II (41459)

Satellites & Observations Observations
#1

On the subject of incorrectly vetted observations…

Regarding Observation 302466 …

I don’t have any huge vested interest in the “rating” of my stations, but perhaps there should be a vetting override feature for station owners? That way those that monitor for these events can avoid contacting admins every time it occurs?

#2

There is already an issue for that https://gitlab.com/librespacefoundation/satnogs/satnogs-network/issues/414 .

Also there is a discussion of having crowdsourcing vetting by allowing more than one people to vet one observation.